Funding opportunity

Funding opportunity: STFC: Industrial CASE and CASE plus studentship

The STFC Industrial CASE studentship competition provides support for PhD students to work in collaboration with a non-academic partner on projects that fall within the STFC core remits in astronomy, particle physics, nuclear physics and accelerator science, or on projects that aim to apply technologies or techniques developed within the programme into other areas.

Projects involve joint supervision of the student by a member of staff at an academic research organisation or related institution and an employee of a non-academic organisation, such as a UK industrial business, public sector organisation or charity (the non-academic partner). This is administered by the Industrial CASE panel.

Who can apply

Proposals should be submitted by a supervisor from a research organisation eligible to be the academic partner through the UKRI Funding Service

Proposals may be led by either the academic supervisor at an eligible UK university or research institute or supervisor/supervisors at the non-academic partner organisation.

The application process must be completed by the academic partner, who will then be the recipient of the award.

Before preparing and submitting a proposal it is essential you ensure the non-academic partner and academic institution are both eligible.

In most cases, the non-academic partner will be a company and must have an established UK-based research, commercial production capability or both.

Organisations eligible to receive our grant funding and those independent research organisations approved as eligible to hold grants may act as the academic partner. Non-university academic-related partners would need to host the studentship in conjunction with the university where the student would be registered. Independent research organisations may act as the non-academic partner if they are unable to award PhDs and a suitable industrial project is proposed. STFC Laboratories are not eligible to act as the non-academic partners.

Other UK-based organisations, including UK subsidiaries of foreign firms, may act as the non-academic partner if they can provide students with distinctive research training and experience not available in an academic setting.

In exceptional cases, organisations based overseas may be eligible. However, they must have an established UK-based research or production capability and be able to provide the student with an opportunity to gain skills not currently available in the UK.

Academic departments must hold STFC studentship accreditation or submit an accreditation application with their proposal. For further information, please contact studentships@stfc.ukri.org

What we're looking for

The Industrial CASE studentship collaborative training competition gives PhD students experience outside a purely academic environment.

The competition provides support for students working on projects that involve joint supervision by a member of staff at an academic or related institution and an employee of a non-academic organisation such as a UK industrial firm, public sector organisation or charity.

The projects must fall within our core science programme in astronomy, solar and planetary science, particle physics, particle astrophysics and cosmology, nuclear physics and accelerator science or must aim to apply technologies or techniques developed within the programme into other areas.

The primary aim of Industrial CASE is to provide the student with training that is high quality, that involves experience outside a purely academic environment and that seeks to further our core science programme or to apply the knowledge and capability developed within the programme to areas where it will have a societal or economic impact.

We will, for all CASE studentships, provide an enhancement to the student stipend of £1,615 (compared with other STFC studentships).

Industrial CASE-plus studentships

The Industrial CASE-plus studentship competition extends the Industrial CASE competition to help students become more effective in promoting technology and knowledge transfer, should their chosen career path take them into either academic research or industry.

For the first three and a half years of the award, Industrial CASE-plus operates in the same way as the Industrial CASE competition. The main difference is that the student spends a further year on the premises of the non-academic partner, working full-time as an employee and gaining further technological training.

Non-academic partner responsibilities

Industrial CASE awards are for a minimum of three and a half years. During the period of the award, the student is required to spend a period of time on the premises of the non-academic partner.

For a three-and-a-half-year award, the cumulative period should be no less than nine months, but this could be spread over the period of the studentship and would not normally exceed 18 months. The time spent during this period should be beneficial to the student, with the non-academic partner providing access to training, facilities and expertise not available in the student’s academic setting.

The non-academic partner is required to take part in recruitment and monitoring of the student and to maintain active contact with the student and academic supervisor throughout the period of the studentship. Non-academic partners (excluding small and medium enterprises (SMEs)) are required to make a financial contribution to both the student and the project. It must include:

  • a minimum annual contribution to the academic research organisation towards the cost of the project of £1,400
  • all additional expenses incurred by the student as a direct result of attendance at the premises of the non-academic partner, such as the cost of travel and accommodation (including the cost of flights in the case of overseas companies)
  • all additional expenses incurred due to the use of equipment and facilities, costs associated with conference and meeting attendance, and consumables
  • a minimum annual contribution to the student of £2,760.

Small and medium enterprises (SMEs)

There is no longer a requirement for SMEs to make a contribution to the academic research organisation or to the student’s stipend. These costs will instead be provided by us. SMEs would still be expected to fund the additional accommodation and travel costs associated with attending the non-academic partner and additional expenses incurred due to the use of equipment and facilities. SMEs can make additional financial contributions.

The definition of an SME is:

  • the company must have a staff headcount of less than 250
  • the company must have a turnover not exceeding €50 million or a balance sheet total not exceeding €43 million.

Industrial CASE-plus studentships only

During the additional year, the student is employed by the non-academic partner at a salary equivalent to that of a new STFC postdoctoral researcher. We will contribute 50% of the salary cost incurred by the non-academic partner (up to a maximum contribution of £14,250). We will not commence funding for the additional year until the PhD thesis has been submitted.

How to apply

We are running this funding opportunity on the new UKRI Funding Service. You cannot apply on the Joint Electronic Submissions (Je-S) system.

The project lead is responsible for completing the application process on the Funding Service, but we expect all team members and project partners to contribute to the application.

Only the lead research organisation can submit an application to UKRI.

To apply:

Select ‘Start application’ near the beginning of this Funding finder page.

  1. Confirm you are the project lead.
  2. Sign in or create a Funding Service account. To create an account, select your organisation, verify your email address, and set a password. If your organisation is not listed, email support@funding-service.ukri.org
  3. Answer questions directly in the text boxes. You can save your answers and come back to complete them or work offline and return to copy and paste your answers. If we need you to upload a document, follow the upload instructions in the Funding Service. All questions and assessment criteria are listed in the How to apply section on this Funding finder page.
  4. Send the completed application to your research office for checking. They will return it to you if it needs editing.
  5. Your research office will submit the completed and checked application to UKRI.

Watch our research office webinars about the new UKRI Funding Service.

Deadline

We must receive your application by 3 October 2023 at 4:00pm UK time.

You will not be able to apply after this time.

Make sure you are aware of and follow any internal institutional deadlines.

Personal data

Processing personal data

STFC as part of UKRI, will need to collect some personal information to manage your funding service account and the registration of your funding applications.

We will handle personal data in line with UK data protection legislation and manage it securely. For more information, including how to exercise your rights, read our privacy notice.

Publication of outcomes

STFC as part of UKRI, will publish the outcomes of this funding opportunity at Industrial CASE studentships.

If your application is successful, we will publish some personal information on the UKRI Gateway to Research.

Summary

Word count: maximum 550

In plain English, provide a summary we can use to identify the most suitable experts to assess your application.

We may make this summary publicly available on external-facing websites, so make it suitable for a variety of readers, for example:

  • opinion-formers
  • policymakers
  • the public
  • the wider research community

Guidance for writing a summary

Clearly describe your proposed work in terms of:

  • context
  • the challenge the project addresses
  • aims and objectives
  • potential applications and benefits

Core team

List the key members of your team and assign them roles from the following:

  • project lead (PL)
  • project co-lead (UK) (PcL)
  • doctoral student

Only list one individual as project lead.

We recognise that the student will not be recruited at the point of application submission.

Find out more about UKRI’s new grant roles.

Vision

Word count: 750

What are you hoping to achieve with your proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

This section allows you to give a brief overview of the project and outline the vison of the project, covering the following criteria:

  • is the proposed project well-aligned to our core programme?
  • is the project of a sufficient quality for a PhD project?
  • what is innovative about this project? Identify the extent to which the project is innovative both commercially and technically
  • describe any evidence you have to substantiate your belief that the intended project is innovative
  • highlight and explain the timeliness and novelty of the project.

Give details of the economic, social and environmental benefits that the project is expected to deliver. List any beneficiaries from the research, for example those who will benefit from the proposed research- directly or indirectly. It may be useful to think of beneficiaries as ‘users’ of the research outputs. Beneficiaries must consist of a wider group than that of the investigator’s immediate professional circle carrying out similar research.

Economic – Highlight benefits to users, suppliers, the broader industrial markets and the UK economy. The application should identify and quantify where possible the benefit to each of the beneficiaries.

Social – Quantify any expected social impacts, either positive or negative, on, for example, the quality of life, social inclusion/exclusion, education, public empowerment, health and safety, regulation, diversity and any expected impact on government priorities.

Environmental – If applicable, demonstrate how the project will benefit the natural environment:

  • what economic, social & environmental benefits, beyond that of the investigator’s immediate professional circle, is the project expected to deliver?
  • has a case been made for the collaboration?

Explain how the collaboration will provide the student with a challenging research training experience, within a context of a mutually beneficial research collaboration between the student, academic and non-academic industry partner. Explain how the project will be managed in order to maximise the benefit to all parties in terms of student training and scientific output showing:

  • how will the collaboration benefit the proposed project? Can the project be done without the collaboration?
  • how will the collaboration benefit both the academic and non-academic partner?
  • has a case been made for the collaboration?
  • provide the unique qualities of the collaboration. How will the collaboration benefit the proposed project? Can the project be done without the collaboration?

Approach

Word count: 750

How are you going to deliver your proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

This section enables the CASE Panel to assess the scientific merit of the project; please write clearly with sufficient detail.

Give references to our strategic priorities and explain how the project is aligned to our core programme.

Provide a detailed and comprehensive project plan, describing the milestones, methodology, experimental approaches, study designs and techniques to be used. You may use a Gantt chart to detail the milestones. Highlight plans which are particularly original or unique.

Give comprehensive and technical details of the anticipated work the student will complete while at the non-academic partner – refer to timelines if appropriate. Is the project achievable for the student in the time frame and are the milestones realistic?

It is the nature of research that the outcomes of a project cannot be predicted. It is important that the key technical and other risks to the successful delivery of the project are identified in the proposal, and contingency plans are in place to ensure the project has successful outcomes.

Therefore, identify key risks and uncertainties of the project (technical, environmental), and provide a risk analysis for the project content and approach. Explain how the project would mitigate these key risks and alternative approaches that may be used in contingency. Give details of the arrangements that are in place for managing risks. You may provide this information as narrative or within a table (example below).

Risk Unmitigated severity* Mitigation Mitigated Severity*

*Numerical scale – 1=negligible to 5=severe

Management, training and supervision: academic partner

Word count: 500

Give details of the academic training and research environment and explain how this will benefit both the student and the project. Provide a clear project plan of how the project will be managed, including how the student’s time will be split between the academic research organisation (RO) and the non-academic partner research training environment and how these fit in with the aspects of the project.

Give details of how the training and research environment will enrich the student’s experience. You must provide details of the academic supervisor. In most cases this will be the main supervisor (please indicate if the non-academic supervisor is taking the lead supervisory role).

You may wish to include:

  • integration with existing students
  • interactions with other researchers and staff
  • opportunities to participate in interdisciplinary teamwork
  • current infrastructure, expertise, facilities and technologies available in the department or group and the organisation
  • a timeline showing how the student’s time will be split between the academic RO and the non-academic partner.

Give details of how you will address the project-specific needs of the student, highlighting how this addresses strategic skills gaps (where relevant) and how the project will be managed so that the work at the academic RO can derive greatest benefit from the placement for the student.

You may wish to include:

  • appropriate practical and technical research training
  • specific training courses and seminars for example computing and statistical techniques
  • wider skills training for example health and safety, business and finance related training and transferrable skills and employability

Clearly show the role that the academic department will play to ensure high quality supervision of the student and the proper monitoring of student progress throughout the duration of the award

You may wish to include:

  • what is the overall quality of the academic research environment and training programme to be made available to the student?
  • does the academic partner show a level of commitment to the studentship and provide interactions with other students and researchers?
  • are there suitable arrangements in place for supervision of the student at both the academic and non-academic partners?
  • are there provisions in place for monitoring progress?
  • how will the collaboration benefit the training experience of the student?

Management, training and supervision: non- academic partner

Word count: 500

Give details of the non-academic training and research environment and explain how this will benefit the student and the project. Clearly state what facilities will be available and how the project will relate to them. You must provide details of the non-academic student supervisor connected with the project and the planned input with the student.

You may wish to include:

  • integration with existing students, if applicable.
  • interactions with other researchers and staff, such as technicians, health and safety, lab scientists, senior scientists, IP and legal reps, sales, managers, directors, CEO, CSO.
  • opportunities to participate in interdisciplinary teamwork.
  • current infrastructure, expertise, facilities, and technologies available in the organisation.

Give details of how you will address the project-specific and generic training needs of the student, highlighting how this addresses strategic skills gaps, where relevant, and how the project will be managed so that the work while at the non-academic partner will be carried out with greatest benefit to the student.

You may wish to include:

  • appropriate practical and technical research training
  • specific training courses and seminars
  • internal arrangements for planning, managing and monitoring its provision of postgraduate research training
  • computing
  • statistical techniques
  • wider skills training for example health and safety, presentation and communication skills, team working, time-management, business and finance related training
  • intellectual property related training

Clearly show the role that the non-academic organisation will play to ensure high quality supervision of the student and the proper monitoring of student progress throughout the duration of the award including:

  • what is the overall quality of the non-academic environment and the research training programme to be made available to the student by the non-academic partner?
  • what facilities does the non-academic environment provide for research training and does the proposed project relate to the facilities available?
  • what is the overall quality of the proposed management of the student with the non-academic partner?
  • are there suitable arrangements in place for supervision of the student at both the academic and non-academic partners?
  • are there provisions in place for monitoring progress?
  • are there specific details on specific training that will be carried out when the student is on placement at the non-academic partner which could not be carried out at the academic partner?
  • provide details of specific training that will only be carried out when the student is on placement at the non-academic partner which could not be carried out at the academic partner for example, Health & Safety, marketing & sales, production.
  • how will the collaboration benefit the training experience of the student?

Ethics and responsible research and innovation (RRI)

Word count: 500

What are the ethical or RRI implications and issues relating to the proposed work? If you do not think that the proposed work raises any ethical or RRI issues, explain why.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

  • are there suitable intellectual property arrangements (IPR) in place?
  • how will the collaboration benefit both the academic and non-academic partner?
  • environmental – If applicable, demonstrate how the project will benefit the natural environment
  • where the academic partner is also involved with the non-academic partner, for example, spin-out companies, provide details of how both the academic and non-academic supervisor roles will be defined to give the student the best all round experience. You should declare any interests which anyone named on the application has with any individual, organisation, project partner or supplier involved in the research, or any interest that might be perceived to influence your objectivity in conducting the research. Guidance on providing declarations of interest can be found on the UK Research and Innovation website.

Industrial CASE Plus

Word count: 500

Please provide details of how the additional year will contribute to the project by addressing the following points:

  • describe how the research programme in the additional year will relate to that undertaken in the 3.5 years leading to the PhD
  • give details in terms of time, cost, quality and achievement of how the additional year will enhance the previous work
  • explain what further technology training the student will receive to assist with promoting technology transfer
  • describe how this extra year will help the student become more effective in promoting knowledge transfer should their chosen career path take them into either academic research or industry
  • explain what the benefits will be to the student, the academic partner and the non-academic partner in the additional year

Project partners

Word count: 750

Provide details about any project partners’ contributions.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Download and complete the Project partner contributions template (DOCX, 52KB).

The UKRI Funding Service will provide document upload details when you apply. If you do not have any project partners, you will be able to indicate this in the Funding Service.

Ensure you have obtained prior agreement from project partners that, if you are offered funding, they will support your project as indicated in the contributions template.

For audit purposes, UKRI requires formal collaboration agreements to be put in place if an award is made.

How we will assess your application

Assessment process

We will assess your application using the following process.

Scoring

We will invite experts to score the application against the criteria outlined for this funding opportunity. Applications will then go to a panel who will discuss the individual scoring and arrive at a ranking list having discussed each application fairly. The top ranked candidates will be successful for funding for their CASE studentship proposal.

Timescale

We aim to complete the assessment process within two months of the application deadline.

Feedback

We will give feedback with the outcome of your application.

Principles of assessment

We support the San Francisco declaration on research assessment (DORA) and recognise the relationship between research assessment and research integrity.

Find out about the UKRI Principles of Assessment and Decision Making.

Assessment criteria

Vision:

  • is the proposed project well-aligned to STFC’s core programme?
  • is the project of a sufficient quality for a PhD project?
  • is this an Innovative project? (Has evidence been provided to support this?)
  • has a case been made for the collaboration?
  • are the economic, social and environmental benefits of the project clear and realistic?

Approach:

  • has a detailed and comprehensive project plan detailing milestones,methodology and approach been provided?
  • is the project achievable for the student in the time frame and are the milestones realistic?
  • is there consideration of the project risks (technical, environmental) and alternative approaches that may be used in contingency?

Management training and supervision – academic partner:

  • what is the overall quality of the academic research environment and training programme to be made available to the student?
  • does the academic partner show a level of commitment to the studentship and provide interaction with other students and researchers?
  • are there suitable arrangements in place for supervision of the student with the academic partner and monitoring student progress?

Management training and supervision – non-academic partner:

  • what is the overall quality of the industrial research facilities, environment and training programme to be made available to the student?
  • does the non-academic partner provide wider skills training that would not be provided in an academic environment? (including interdisciplinary team work, specific courses, and industrial based training such as Health and Saftey)
  • Are there suitable arrangements in place for supervision of the student with the non- academic partner and monitoring student progress?

Responsible research and innovation:

  • are there suitable IPR arrangements in place?
  • will the collaboration benefit both the academic and non academic partner?

CASE PLUS:

  • does the additional year research programme relate to that undertaken in the 3.5 years leading to the PhD and will it enhance the existing work?
  • will the student receive additional technology training to promote technology transfer?
  • will the additional year help the student in promoting knowledge transfer in research or industry?
  • are the additional benefits of the year to clear for the student, the academic partner and the non- academic partner?
  • is this a fundable project?

Find details of assessment questions and criteria under the ‘Application questions’ heading in the How to apply section.

Contact details

Get help with your application

For help on costings and writing your application, contact your STFC at studentships@stfc.ac.uk

Allow enough time for your organisation’s submission process.

Ask about this funding opportunity

Email: support@funding-service.ukri.org

Phone: 01793 547490

Our phone lines are open:

  • Monday to Thursday 8:30am to 5:00pm
  • Friday 8:30am to 4:30pm

Sensitive information

If you or a core team member need to tell us something you wish to remain confidential, email the Funding Service helpdesk on support@funding-service.ukri.org

Include in the subject line: the funding opportunity title; sensitive information; your Funding Service application number.

Typical examples of confidential information include:

  • individual is unavailable until a certain date (for example due to parental leave)
  • declaration of interest
  • additional information about eligibility to apply that would not be appropriately shared in the Applicant and team capability section
  • conflict of interest for UKRI to consider in reviewer or panel participant selection
  • the application is an invited resubmission

For information about how UKRI handles personal data, read UKRI’s privacy notice

This is the website for UKRI: our seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help improve our online products and services.