Funding opportunity

Funding opportunity: Research skills leadership hub: full (Invite only)

Start application

Invited teams can apply for funding to deliver a new strategic leadership hub that supports the development and delivery of research skills training and capacity building (TCB) provision in the social sciences. The hub will provide leadership across the social science community and innovate in the way research skills TCB is both conceived and delivered.

The duration of this grant is five years and it must start by 1 October 2025. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) will fund one grant through this funding opportunity and will contribute a maximum of £5 million over five years.

Who can apply

You can only apply to this funding opportunity if you submitted an expression of interest to the ‘Expression of interest: Research skills strategic leadership hub’ funding opportunity that closed in October 2024 and we have subsequently invited you to submit a full application. Any uninvited applications will be rejected.

To lead a project, you must be based at an eligible organisation. Check if your organisation is eligible

Who is eligible to apply

Applicants invited to apply to this funding opportunity must meet at least one of the following criteria:

  • be based at an eligible organisation
  • have an agreement with an eligible organisation to work there and have access to the appropriate research facilities for the duration of the grant

International applicants

Project leads from non-UK organisations are not eligible to apply for funding for this funding opportunity.

Project co-leads based in non-UK research organisations can be included in research grant applications. Read project co-lead (international) policy guidance for details of eligible organisations and costs.

Business, third sector or government body project co-leads

Business, third sector or government body project co-leads based in the UK can also be included on research grant proposals as a project co-lead. Read Including project co-leads from business, third sector or government bodies for details of eligible organisations and costs.

Resubmissions

We will not accept uninvited resubmissions of projects that have been submitted to UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)

Find out more about ESRC’s Resubmissions policy.

Equality, diversity and inclusion

We are committed to achieving equality of opportunity for all funding applicants. We encourage applications from a diverse range of researchers.

We support people to work in a way that suits their personal circumstances. This includes:

  • career breaks
  • support for people with caring responsibilities
  • flexible working
  • alternative working patterns

UKRI can offer disability and accessibility support for UKRI applicants and grant holders during the application and assessment process.

Remit

Complete and submit the remit query form, if you are unsure whether your proposed application falls within the remit of ESRC.

What we're looking for

Scope

We are commissioning a new infrastructure investment to support research skills development in the social sciences. This new investment will take the form of a strategic leadership hub and will involve leading change in the UK research sector to implement our new approach to supporting research skills development.

We seek to be relevant to social scientists working across academia, government, business, third sector and beyond. The hub will provide leadership across the social science community in these sectors, innovating the way in which research skills training and capacity building (TCB) is both conceived and delivered. It will create a connected community of research skills TCB providers that work collaboratively, and at scale, to simplify how researchers navigate the provision they need.

This investment will deliver part of our commitment to sustain a world-class, diverse and inclusive research base that supports talent across the entire research career and powers the best research across the breadth of our disciplines. Our new approach to supporting research skills TCB in the social sciences seeks to co-ordinate strategically our research skills TCB provision and innovate to enable effective learning and a culture of continuing skills development.

We expect this investment to be responsive to changes in our policy and strategy.

Our new approach has four core components:

  • a focus on the breadth of research skills needed throughout the chronology of a typical research project, from research design to engagement with users of research and impact
  • a federated structure of research skills TCB led by a new leadership hub
  • enabling a culture of lifelong learning with targeted support for researchers at all career stages
  • creation of a single, streamlined ‘shop window’ of TCB resources

Details of our ambition, new approach, and what we mean by ‘research skills’ (for example research methods, evidence synthesis, evaluation, policy engagement) can be found in the ‘Additional information’ section. You must read this before applying.

The new strategic leadership hub will:

  • lead on the strategic development and delivery of research skills TCB opportunities, ensuring they reflect needs across career stages and remain relevant and future-proofed, through collaboration with TCB providers
  • create the mechanisms, partnerships and networks to co-ordinate research skills TCB delivered by our existing and new investments (including specialist investments already funded to deliver a programme of TCB), and identify and address any gaps in TCB provision. This will need to include providers external to the hub.
  • design and build an accessible and inclusive IT infrastructure to co-ordinate and make available TCB provision
  • work with the social science community to understand needs, promote the importance of research skills development, and to improve provision, access and uptake
  • phase activity to expand delivery and impact beyond the academic social science community to other disciplines and sectors

Our goals are ambitious and to effect real change this will need to be a long-term venture with a phased approach to delivering activity. We will initially fund the strategic leadership hub for five years (funding period one); the hub will then be invited to apply for a further five years of funding (funding period two), subject to positive stage gate reviews.

Further information can be found in the ‘Duration’ section below. You are expected to have a clear vision for the hub and be able to articulate how activity will be phased over the two funding periods to achieve its aims and objectives.

You are invited to submit a full application for the research skills strategic leadership hub through this funding opportunity. In addition to further developing your vision, you are expected to demonstrate the deliverability of your proposed approach.

Your application should clearly set out how you will achieve the aims and objectives of the hub and be specific about what success will look like. Our requirements are set out in this funding opportunity. Please read it carefully. Whilst much of the content will be familiar to you, some text has been updated following the expressions of interest stage.

Responsibilities and requirements of the new strategic leadership hub

The hub will have three key areas of responsibility:

  • strategic development of research skills TCB opportunities
  • strategic leadership, partnerships and collaboration
  • innovation and culture change

The detailed requirements for each area are set out below:

Strategic development of research skills TCB opportunities

  • identify research skills training and development needs across the social sciences and put in place mechanisms to prioritise and address gaps in TCB provision, including in relation to cutting edge approaches as well as established techniques
  • promote a life course approach to researcher development, ensuring that targeted TCB opportunities are available for researchers at all career stages
  • create an integrated and inclusive programme of TCB activities and resources, working with appropriate providers
  • put in place a technical infrastructure to provide an accessible and inclusive user-driven portal that provides researchers with a single point of access to relevant TCB provision and resources, and maximises the user experience
  • develop and implement a strategy to expand delivery and impact beyond the academic social science community to other disciplines and sectors

Strategic leadership, partnerships and collaboration

  • engage with and promote collaboration between TCB providers by creating appropriate structures, networks, partnerships and fora to deliver research skills TCB effectively and efficiently. This should also enable providers to identify common challenges and develop opportunities to work together to add value for researchers
  • co-ordinate and streamline existing TCB activities
  • understand and engage with key stakeholders, including within academia, government, business and the third sector, to understand current and future TCB needs within the social sciences

Innovation and culture change

  • think innovatively about pedagogical practice, drawing on the latest research and evidence of good practice. This philosophy will drive the hub’s approach.
  • strongly promote the development of research skills capability throughout a researcher’s career by facilitating access to TCB provision
  • actively encourage the removal of any barriers to social scientists developing their research skills at different career stages (which may be non-linear)
  • champion the trialling of new mechanisms that encourage take up of TCB at different career stages, or that incentivise and reward researchers who contribute to TCB activities
  • encourage the sharing good practice in this area from both within the UK and internationally

In developing its provision, the hub will need to respond to the skills needs across the breadth of the social science community, tailored for the community. Activities will support the uptake of cutting-edge approaches as well as established techniques.

Applications must set out how skills needs will be identified and addressed as well as indicate the volume and nature of new TCB activities that will be delivered by the hub and/or its partners in a typical year.

We are committed to knowledge exchange and encouraging collaboration between
researchers and the private, public and civil society sectors. These sectors employ social scientists and can offer valuable insights about current and future skills needs in the social sciences. Knowledge exchange and collaboration should not be treated as an ‘add-on’ at the end of a grant but considered before the start and embedded in activity.

Your application must include an engagement strategy that identifies key stakeholders, their needs, how the hub will engage with them and how this will support the successful delivery of the hub.

If successful, you will then be required to submit plans for communication, engagement and impact activity within six months of the start of your grant. These documents can be kept separate or combined. You will undertake a detailed stakeholder mapping exercise to inform the development of these plans.

Effective delivery of the strategic leadership hub will require:

A clear vision:

You will have a long-term vision for the role of the hub and an understanding of how it will grow and evolve over time. Early decisions made setting up the hub should not restrict the hub’s ability to respond to opportunities later.

Effective leadership:

You must be able to articulate the leadership approach that will be adopted by the hub.

Effective partnerships and collaborations:

Applications will detail how the hub will work with our wider portfolio to deliver its goals. This includes the hub’s approach to:

  • building and developing meaningful partnerships that deliver relevant outputs or outcomes
  • collective leadership, including how decision making will be inclusive and representative where appropriate

Knowledge of the skills landscape in the social sciences, including academia and beyond:

You must demonstrate an appreciation of the expertise within our existing portfolio as well as the wider TCB landscape. The hub will need to have strong sector engagement to ensure its knowledge of the landscape is maintained and it is able to identify opportunities to enhance access for social scientists to TCB provision outside the social sciences and beyond academia.

Agility:

The hub will need to be structured in a way that enables it to adapt and respond effectively to an evolving research landscape that is increasingly interdisciplinary, reaches across sectors, and facilitates a diversity of research careers, including those that are non-linear.

Feedback on performance:

The hub will need to have mechanisms in place to monitor and evaluate progress, and ensure it remains at the cutting edge of TCB. Feedback from stakeholders will be a critical evidence source that will need to inform future activity.

Appropriate balance of resourcing:

The hub will not be able to deliver everything possible with the budget it has and so activity will need to be prioritised. The allocation of resourcing will need to be fully justified, and sufficient time must be committed by key members of the team.

The development of a skills taxonomy:

The hub will need to organise its training portfolio in a way that can be easily communicated to and understood by all stakeholders including both users of the hub and TCB providers. A skills taxonomy could be an effective tool, acting as a building block for the hub’s wider work. You should explain how the skills taxonomy will be used to inform TCB activities.

Professional support:

The hub will be a complex grant to manage and will require a mix of both academic and professional expertise. You should consider how expertise in project management, business development, organisational learning and development, and stakeholder management and engagement will ensure and enhance the hub’s ability to deliver its goals (see ‘Team composition and leadership’ section below for more information)

Funding can be used to:

  • enable skills needs analysis and the identification of TCB gaps
  • commission training and capacity building activities: this can include a breadth of activities beyond traditional training courses and online reference materials and should include consideration of innovations in research methodologies, pedagogical practice and training and development
  • co-create new TCB activities or provision
  • experiment with innovative pedagogy
  • pilot initiatives to increase uptake of training opportunities at mid and senior career stages
  • pilot approaches to incentivise and reward researchers who contribute to TCB delivery and sharing of good practice
  • enable the discovery and navigation of and access to TCB provision
  • enable networks that support the delivery of the hub’s responsibilities
  • develop and maintain the IT infrastructure required to support the hub
  • support the hub’s governance, including external advisory functions

We will not fund research or PhD studentships.

The strategic leadership hub could be based at a single organisation or comprise a consortium of organisations eligible for ESRC funding. Funding can be used to deliver the aims and objectives of the grant through the hub and/or by making awards externally to other providers.

Policies and processes for allocating funding across the hub’s partners must be detailed at the full proposal stage and fully comply with our funding rules, including compliance with the UK Subsidy Control Act 2022. The lead research organisation (RO)’s processes must be followed when contracting externally and professionally qualified procurement staff consulted, where appropriate.

It is expected that resources and other outputs developed will use software with high interoperability and that they will be designed in such a way that they can be transferred to another RO should the need arise.

Robust system design methodology should be used to ensure best practice is followed across the entire delivery system. For example, high quality documentation and guidance should be maintained to support this process. To ensure resources continue to be made available for use by the community, all training outputs, tools and resources created by the hub are expected to be made available under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence.

The opportunities and benefits of using new technologies and techniques such as artificial intelligence (AI) is recognised. Applications utilising such approaches must state clearly how they will be used; why they are appropriate and how they will add value. Associated risks must also have been considered and addressed.

Flexible funds

The award will allow the use of flexible funds; a mechanism used by networks, hubs and other similar types of investments to contract further projects or activities, including the delivery of new training. Where utilised:

  • applications should explain why this mechanism has been chosen. You are expected to have considered all options for delivering new training
  • clear and transparent processes will need to be put in place for awarding funding and you must set out what these are in your application. This must include processes for dealing with conflicts of interest

Flexible funds are typically used to commission or procure new research and activities external to the main grant. To avoid conflicts of interest, it is advised that the project leads and any staff employed to work in the hub should not be eligible to apply to the commissioning fund.

The hub must follow ESRC rules for funding, including funding rules for flexible funds:

  • flexible funds must be funded as ‘Directly incurred (DI) other costs’. While the flexible fund is awarded to the hub as a DI Other cost, these funds do not have to remain as DI costs when awarded to the subsequent small grants; they can be awarded as directly allocated (DA), DI and indirect as appropriate
  • flexible funds will be ring-fenced and any specific spend requirements added as a grant condition. Funding allocated to the flexible pot will not be eligible to be vired to cover other costs related to the core funding of the hub without prior approval from ESRC
  • as with the main grant, costs associated with academic staff will be funded in the usual way with ESRC contributing 80% of these costs and the remaining balance being guaranteed by the RO. All other costs are eligible to be claimed under ‘Exceptions’.
  • where activity should be funded at 80% full economic cost (FEC) funding, the remaining 20% will be met by the recipient grant ROs. The RO hosting the hub will not need to bear the cost of the 20% matched funding
  • sub-contracted work must follow our requirements as set out in our ESRC research funding guide and our terms and conditions for research grants. You must also comply with the procurement policies of your research organisation and are advised to seek advice from relevant colleagues when preparing your bid.

Expected outcomes

We seek to be relevant to social scientists working across academia, government, business, third sector and beyond. Investing in a new strategic leadership hub will enable us to improve access and navigation for researchers by:

  • simplifying how researchers navigate the provision they need
  • offering tailored support for researchers at different career stages and across the talent pipeline
  • enabling the development of research skills across the full chronology of a typical research project; from design to impact
  • enabling researchers to benefit from TCB opportunities within and beyond the social sciences

The new strategic leadership hub will also enable us to achieve the goals set out in strategic delivery plan by:

  • systematically identifying TCB needs and addressing gaps in provision
  • maximising the effectiveness and efficiency of our TCB portfolio
  • supporting our response to the data-driven research skills steering group report
  • supporting interdisciplinary research by enabling social scientists to access training delivered in other research council domains and opening up social science TCB provision to researchers outside the social sciences
  • improving inclusion within the TCB provision we support by embedding EDI good practice

As noted previously, our goals are ambitious and to effect real change this will need to be a long-term venture with a phased approach to delivering activity. By the end of the initial five-year funding period the hub is expected to have achieved all of its aims and responsibilities.

The hub should have moved from an initiation or start-up phase through to a steady state of ‘business as usual’ (BAU). You must clearly identify key outputs and outcomes that will be delivered during the funding period as well as articulate what BAU will look like. You must also briefly outline what the hub’s priorities will be in the second period of funding. The prioritisation of activities must be fully justified.

Our priorities

The strategic leadership hub will have a critical role to play in helping us meet our emerging strategic skills needs. We have already identified the following areas that need to be addressed as a priority. These are:

  • research methods
  • data-driven research skills
  • achieving impact through research

Additionally, responses from our engagement survey undertaken in spring 2024 highlighted a strong demand for support in interdisciplinary working. You should consider how this will be incorporated into your vision for the hub.

Support for research methods training should take into account the full breadth of methods used within the social sciences including qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Provision will also need to be responsive to new methodological developments in the social sciences.

More broadly, the hub is expected to engage with relevant ESRC strategic activities and be responsive to new needs identified through these activities. The hub should benefit from a delivery model that allows it to adapt its provision accordingly.

Applications must detail how the strategic leadership hub will support skills development in these areas as part of its broader programme of work. Activity should be embedded rather than addressed in isolation.

Team composition and leadership

We are looking for a team with an ambitious and innovative vision to realise our goals as well as the expertise, networks and collaborations required to deliver it. Collectively, the team composition must demonstrate the hub has the skills and expertise necessary to deliver the work set out in your application.

The team should have a diverse range of skills and experience including the professional skills needed to deliver the following responsibilities:

  • leadership, management and organisation of the hub
  • learning and development and research skills pedagogy
  • administration of TCB activities
  • stakeholder management and engagement
  • sustainable development and growth
  • development and maintenance of the IT infrastructure

The hub must be resourced adequately and the time committed by core staff to their hub responsibilities will need to be fully justified. The director must commit at least 40% of their time to the hub.

Applications must explicitly articulate how the expertise of the proposed team will enable the hub to deliver its responsibilities.

You should ensure that the grant roles allocated to individuals on the UKRI Funding Service are eligible; appropriate; and correctly costed. Read Roles in funding applications: eligibility, responsibilities and costings guidance; Including project co-leads from business, third sector or government bodies and the ESRC research funding guide for details of eligible organisations and costs. Further information on project partners can be found in the ‘Additional information’ section.

Career and skills development

UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) is a signatory to the Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers, and the Technician Commitment, through which UKRI commits to support the professional and career development of researchers and technicians through its funding opportunities. We encourage you to follow the principles of the Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers and the Technician Commitment and you will need to articulate your plans for the professional development of staff in your team at this full application stage.

You are encouraged to consider both leadership development and capacity building in your plans.

Structure, leadership, management and governance

The hub should be structured in a way that enables it to successfully deliver the objectives of the funding opportunity, whether through a consortium approach or single institution.

The hub will be expected to have appropriate and effective governance and mechanisms in place to provide it with strategic oversight and advice that meets the full spectrum of the hub’s responsibilities. These structures should include:

  • an advisory committee with a strategic and scientific focus. It will include a diversity of stakeholders, members at different career stages and will have a strong role in the development of the hub. Non-academic and international representation is expected in order for the hub to gain insight into activity taking place outside of UK academia, enabling cross-fertilisation of ideas and opportunities
  • a decision-making group with responsibility for allocating funding, including funds awarded through flexible funds (if required)
  • clear mechanisms for capturing and responding to stakeholder feedback

A full leadership and management plan must be provided, demonstrating how you will provide leadership across collaborators, and how the management of the hub and its activities will be carried out, including details of project management and administrative resource. You are also expected to indicate your plans for monitoring progress against the hub’s goals as well as any plans for self-evaluation throughout the lifetime of the hub.

The hub is a brand new investment for us and it is important you understand the risks associated with establishing and delivering the hub and manage these effectively.

Applications must identify key risks and explain what action will be taken to mitigate them and whose responsibility this will be. If successful, you will then be expected to submit a full risk management strategy to us within three months of the start of your grant.

Equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI)

The strategic leadership hub is expected to improve inclusion within the TCB provision. We support by delivering an inclusive programme of TCB activities and resources and embedding EDI good practice throughout its activities. You are expected to:

  • detail how the team intends to develop and implement good practice for inclusive TCB at all stages of activity, for example planning, delivery, outputs and so on
  • demonstrate and evidence the team’s commitment to embedding EDI in TCB practice
  • explain what policies and systems will be necessary to achieve these commitments
  • detail how the hub will ensure inclusive ways of working as a team and throughout the collaboration (if relevant)
  • reflect EDI considerations in any proposed cost recovery models

The hub is expected to have a clear EDI policy and will be expected to evaluate its inclusive practice throughout its funding period, responding to conclusions and recommendations as they arise.

Monitoring, evaluation and investment management

The hub will be subject to two stage gate reviews, at the end of year one and at the end of year three. Monitoring metrics will also be agreed with the successful applicant. Further detail can be found in the ‘Additional Information’ section below. Stage gate guidance will be updated to reflect the proposed plans of the successful applicant.

The hub will be required to participate in:

  • regular progress meetings with ESRC. These meetings will take place quarterly in the first year. Progress reports will need to be submitted for discussion at these meetings. The frequency of meetings will be reviewed after the first stage gate.
  • two facilitated workshops with the National Centre for Research Methods (NCRM) between October and December 2025. The centre has significant experience delivering high quality, impactful TCB activities and these workshops will offer a valuable opportunity to share learning.

Additionally, the hub will be expected to put in place its own monitoring and evaluation arrangements. Applications should provide an overview of these arrangements, if successful, a full monitoring and evaluation plan will then need to be submitted to us within six months of the start of your grant.

Applications must include critical success indicators and explain how they will be used by the hub to monitor progress.

Impact

We expect you to consider the potential academic, societal and economic impacts of your activity. Outputs, dissemination and impact will be a key component used to assess applications.

The hub will need to be able to demonstrate the outcomes and impacts of its work, putting in place a strategy to develop and communicate an impact narrative. You are expected to detail your approach in your application.

Organisational support and co-funding

We encourage significant institutional commitment from the host organisation and where appropriate, partner organisations. This is to both show support of the application and also commitment to the enduring sustainability of the infrastructure.

This will need to be in the form of long term strategic and financial institutional commitment and should be through the provision of grant associated activities. Examples include but are not limited to, summer schools, refurbishment of facilities for the hub, provision of equipment, administration and new lectureships. Institutional commitments should be fully justified.

The hub will be expected to grow its user base during the course of the grant in a sustainable way. We are not able to increase our contribution to support this growth in users and the hub will be expected to explore opportunities to attract additional external funding.

By the end of the first funding period, the hub should have developed a plan for how it will broaden its funding base and will have trialled approaches to generate revenue.

Continuity of online training provision

ESRC funding for the National Centre for Research Methods (NCRM) will end in December 2025. We havefunded NCRM since 2004 and during this period a rich database of training resources has been compiled (see the current NCRM website).

Currently, the successful applicants will be expected to adopt these resources and continue to make them available, updating them where appropriate. You will need to set out how this will be achieved and commit to working with us, the current NCRM team and the University of Southampton on the development and implementation of a transition plan for online resources. Costs for the hub’s IT infrastructure should be included in applications. The transfer of resources from NCRM to the new hub will be funded separately.

We are currently in discussion with NCRM to commission an NCRM Resource Repository with the expectation that this would maintain access to these resources during the first phase of the hub’s funding. If funded, you will be expected to adapt your plans accordingly. This funding opportunity will be updated with further information in February 2025 and applicants notified.

Duration

The duration of this grant is five years and it must start by 1 October 2025.

The successful applicants will be invited to apply for a further five years of funding, subject to positive stage gate reviews. Funding is expected to be at a similar level and the proposal will be peer-reviewed by a commissioning panel. The budget for this second phase of funding, as well as the commissioning process and timeline, will be confirmed after the second stage-gate review.

Funding available

We will fund one grant through this funding opportunity and will contribute a maximum of £5 million over five years.

All proposals will be subject to ESRC’s funding rules as outlined in our research funding guide.

Costs associated with academic staff will be funded in the usual way with ESRC contributing 80% of these costs and the remaining balance being guaranteed by the research organisation. All other costs are eligible to be claimed under ‘Exceptions’. Please note that indirect and estate costs cannot be claimed for staff costs listed under ‘Exceptions’.

All salary costs, expenses, equipment costs and exceptions must all be clearly and adequately justified. Costings must be correct and provided as instructed on the Funding Service. If successful, applicants and the host RO will be expected to respond promptly to requests for information to support subsidy control checks.

The overall total budget of the hub may be higher than the budget requested in the application. Additional funding leveraged by the investment, either through its participating research organisations, other funders or external co-funding partners, should be noted in the application but not included in the budget requested.

Expectations of applications

You should build on your Expression of Interest, providing more detailed information on your:

  • vision for meeting the overarching objectives of the strategic leadership hub and the expected outcomes
  • approach to delivering their vision and ESRC’s priorities
  • applicant and team capability to successfully deliver the goals of the hub

Additionally, you will need to describe in detail the hub’s approach to:

  • improving inclusion, including embedding EDI
  • flexible funds (if appropriate)
  • structure, leadership, management and governance
  • impact
  • organisational support and co-funding
  • continuity of online training provision

The questions you need to respond to can be found in the ‘How to apply’ section of this funding opportunity and are available on the Funding Service. Where the use of images is permitted in responses, these must not be used to circumvent the word count limits stated for the relevant section. Please consider carefully the text included in images and where it can best be included to maximise the clarity of your application. Further guidance on the use of images can be found on the Funding Service.

Applications must provide assurance that the proposed vision and approach are deliverable and that there has been due consideration of key risks and how they will be mitigated. As part of your application, you are required to submit:

  • a stakeholder engagement strategy
  • critical success indicators
  • a risk management approach
  • an overview of IT infrastructure

Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I)

UKRI is committed in ensuring that effective international collaboration in research and innovation takes place with integrity and within strong ethical frameworks. Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I) is a UKRI work programme designed to help protect all those working in our thriving and collaborative international sector by enabling partnerships to be as open as possible, and as secure as necessary. Our TR&I Principles set out UKRI’s expectations of organisations funded by UKRI in relation to due diligence for international collaboration.

As such, applicants for UKRI funding may be asked to demonstrate how their proposed projects will comply with our approach and expectation towards TR&I, identifying potential risks and the relevant controls you will put in place to help proportionately reduce these risks.

See further guidance and information about TR&I, including where applicants can find additional support.

How to apply

We are running this funding opportunity on the new UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Funding Service. You cannot apply on the Joint Electronic Submissions (Je-S) system.

The project lead is responsible for completing the application process on the Funding Service, but we expect all team members and project partners to contribute to the application.

Only the lead research organisation can submit an application to UKRI.

To apply

Select ‘Start application’ near the beginning of this Funding finder page.

  1. Confirm you are the project lead
  2. Sign in or create a Funding Service account. To create an account, select your organisation, verify your email address, and set a password. If your organisation is not listed, email support@funding-service.ukri.org
    Please allow at least 10 working days for your organisation to be added to the Funding Service. We strongly suggest that if you are asking UKRI to add your organisation to the Funding Service to enable you to apply to this funding opportunity, you also create an organisation Administration Account. This will be needed to allow the acceptance and management of any grant that might be offered to you.
  3. Answer questions directly in the text boxes. You can save your answers and come back to complete them or work offline and return to copy and paste your answers. If we need you to upload a document, follow the upload instructions in the Funding Service. All questions and assessment criteria are listed in the How to apply section on this Funding finder page.
  4. Allow enough time to check your application in ‘read-only’ view before sending to your research office.
  5. Send the completed application to your research office for checking. They will return it to you if it needs editing.
  6. Your research office will submit the completed and checked application to UKRI.

Where indicated, you can also demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. You should:

  • use images sparingly and only to convey important information that cannot easily be put into words
  • insert each new image onto a new line
  • provide a descriptive legend for each image immediately underneath it (this counts towards your word limit)
  • ensure files are smaller than 5MB and in JPEG, JPG, JPE, JFI, JIF, JFIF, PNG, GIF, BMP or WEBP format

Watch our research office webinars about the Funding Service.

For more guidance on the Funding Service, see:

References

Applications should be self-contained, and hyperlinks should only be used to provide links directly to reference information. To ensure the information’s integrity is maintained, where possible, persistent identifiers such as digital object identifiers should be used. Assessors are not required to access links to carry out assessment or recommend a funding decision. Applicants should use their discretion when including reference and prioritise those most pertinent to the application.

References should be included in the appropriate question section of the application and be easily identifiable by the assessors for example (Smith, Research Paper, 2019).

You must not include links to web resources to extend your application.

Generative artificial intelligence (AI)

Use of generative AI tools to prepare funding applications is permitted, however, caution should be applied.

For more information see our policy on the use of generative AI in application and assessment.

Deadline

ESRC must receive your application by 4.00pm UK time on 1 April 2025.

You will not be able to apply after this time.

Make sure you are aware of and follow any internal institutional deadlines.

Following the submission of your application to the funding opportunity, your application cannot be changed, and applications will not be returned for amendment. If your application does not follow the guidance, it may be rejected.

Personal data

Processing personal data

ESRC, as part of UKRI, will need to collect some personal information to manage your Funding Service account and the registration of your funding applications.

We will handle personal data in line with UK data protection legislation and manage it securely. For more information, including how to exercise your rights, read our privacy notice.

Sensitive information

If you or a core team member need to tell us something you wish to remain confidential, email researchskills@esrc.ukri.org

Include in the subject line: [the funding opportunity title; sensitive information; your Funding Service application number].

Typical examples of confidential information include:

  • individual is unavailable until a certain date (for example due to parental leave)
  • declaration of interest
  • additional information about eligibility to apply that would not be appropriately shared in the ‘Applicant and team capability’ section
  • conflict of interest for UKRI to consider in reviewer or panel participant selection
  • the application is an invited resubmission

For information about how UKRI handles personal data, read UKRI’s privacy notice.

Publication of outcomes

ESRC, as part of UKRI, will publish the outcomes of this funding opportunity at What ESRC has funded.

If your application is successful, we will publish some personal information on the UKRI Gateway to Research.

Summary

Word limit: 550

In plain English, provide a summary we can use to identify the most suitable experts to assess your application.

We may make this summary publicly available on external-facing websites, therefore do not include any confidential or sensitive information. Make it suitable for a variety of readers, for example:

  • opinion-formers
  • policymakers
  • the public
  • the wider research community

Guidance for writing a summary

Clearly describe your proposed work in terms of:

  • context
  • the challenge the project addresses
  • aims and objectives
  • expected benefits and impacts

Core team

List the key members of your team and assign them roles from the following:

  • project lead (PL)
  • project co-lead (UK) (PcL)
  • project co-lead (international) (PcL (I))
  • specialist
  • grant manager
  • professional enabling staff
  • research and innovation associate
  • technician
  • visiting researcher

Only list one individual as project lead.

UKRI has introduced a new addition to the ‘Specialist’ role type. Public contributors such as people with lived experience can now be added to an application.

Find out more about UKRI’s core team roles in funding applications.

Application questions

Vision

Word limit: 1,000

What are you hoping to achieve with the proposed infrastructure?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Explain how the proposed infrastructure will:

  • be timely, given current trends and context
  • meet the evidenced needs of clearly identified user groups
  • have measurable impact
  • enable high quality and important research
  • meet the strategic aims of the funder or government
  • offer training opportunities
  • enhance, benefit and complement the existing landscape
  • support innovation in research
  • be of international importance (if applicable)

Within the Vision section we also expect you to:

  • describe your long-term vision for the role of the hub and how it will grow and evolve over time
  • demonstrate the alignment of your application to the strategic aims of the funding opportunity, the expectations of the hub, and the expected outcomes
  • clearly state the research skills challenges that you will address
  • explain how activity will be prioritised, describing what ‘business as usual’ will look like at the end of the initial funding period and briefly outlining the hub’s priorities in the second phase of funding
  • include a logic model demonstrating how the changes that the hub will bring about will deliver the expected outcomes and how and why its programme of activity will bring about those changes. Your logic model should be clear and concise; and must support the application. It must not be used to introduce new information. This can be added as an image.

References may be included within this section.

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

Approach

Word limit: 3,000

How are you going to deliver your proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

We expect you to show how your approach:

  • is effective and appropriate to achieve your objectives
  • is feasible, and comprehensively identifies any risks to delivery and how they will be managed
  • summarises the previous work and describes how this will be built upon and progressed (if applicable)
  • will maximise translation of outputs into outcomes and impacts
  • describes how your, and if applicable your team’s, research environment (in terms of the place and relevance to the project) will contribute to the success of the work

Within the Approach section we also expect you to:

  • explain how your approach will meet the approach and delivery requirements set out in the funding opportunity as well as deliver ESRC’s priorities
  • highlight areas of innovation, steps, or both taken to deliver a step change in the way research skills training and capacity building is supported in the social sciences
  • explain your approach to staged delivery including how this has informed the prioritisation and differentiation of activity where relevant
  • indicate the volume and nature of new TCB activities that will be delivered by the hub and/or its partners in a typical year
  • summarise what steps you will take to provide opportunities for users and partners to both inform the development of and benefit from the work of the strategic leadership hub
  • demonstrate consideration of the full user journey for key stakeholders including how users will discover and engage with the hub
  • demonstrate an in-depth understanding of the hub’s stakeholders and articulate a strategic approach to stakeholder engagement
  • explain how you plan to promote the hub; the opportunities it offers social scientists; and hub’s outputs and how it will be tailored for different audiences
  • provide a detailed and comprehensive project plan including milestones and timelines and demonstrate its feasibility
  • identify what success will look like. Indicators of success to determine the delivery of outputs and outcomes should be provided as part of your response
  • consider the professional development of hub staff
  • explain what steps you will take to maximise the academic, societal and economic impact of the hub and how impact will be evidenced
  • plans for sustainable growth – these could include cost recovery models, securing additional funding

References may be included within this section.

You may demonstrate elements of your response in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

Overview of IT infrastructure

Word limit: 500

Please provide an IT Infrastructure overview.

What the assessors are looking for in your response
  • The overview should describe the IT infrastructure that will be used to deliver the hub, how appropriate industry standards and good practice will be followed across the entire delivery system, and how resources and other outputs will be designed such that they will be transferable to another host organisation should the need arise.

You may demonstrate elements of your response in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

Stakeholder engagement strategy

Word limit: 1,000

Please provide a stakeholder engagement strategy

What the assessors are looking for in your response
  • The strategy should describe how stakeholder engagement will support the successful delivery of the hub. It should explain how partnerships will be planned and managed as well as how the partnerships will enable stakeholders to work together, network and build capacity in strategic areas.

You may demonstrate elements of your response in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

Risk management approach

Word limit: 1,000

Please set out the risk management approach

What the assessors are looking for in your response
  • Your response should identify key risks, explain what action will be taken to mitigate the risks and whose responsibility this will be.

You may demonstrate elements of your response in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

Applicant and team capability to deliver

Word limit: 3,000

Why are you the right individual or team to deliver and manage the proposed infrastructure?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Evidence of how you, and if relevant your team, have:

  • the relevant experience (appropriate to career stage)
  • the right balance of skills and expertise
  • the appropriate leadership and management skills and your approach to developing others
  • contributed to developing a positive research environment and wider community

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

The word count for this section is 3000 words: 2000 words to be used for R4RI modules (including references) and, if necessary, a further 1000 words for Additions.

Use the Résumé for Research and Innovation (R4RI) format to showcase the range of relevant skills you, and if relevant, your team (project and project co-leads, researchers, technicians, specialists, partners and so on), have and how this will help to deliver the proposed work. You can include individuals’ specific achievements but only choose past contributions that best evidence their ability to deliver this work.

Complete this section using the R4RI module headings listed below. You should use each heading once and include a response for the whole team, see the UKRI guidance on R4RI. You should consider how to balance your answer, and emphasise where appropriate the key skills each team member brings:

  • contributions to the generation of new ideas, tools, methodologies, or knowledge
  • the development of others and maintenance of effective working relationships
  • contributions to the wider research and innovation community
  • contributions to broader research or innovation users and audiences and towards wider societal benefit

Additions: Provide any further details relevant to your application. This section is optional and can be up to 1000 words. You should not use it to describe additional skills, experiences or outputs, but you can use it to describe any factors that provide context for the rest of your R4RI (for example, details of career breaks if you wish to disclose them).

You should complete this section as a narrative. Do not format it like a CV.

The roles in funding applications policy has descriptions of the different project roles.

Ethics and responsible research and innovation (RRI)

Word limit: 500

What are the ethical and RRI implications and issues relating to the proposed work? If you do not think that the proposed work raises any ethical or RRI issues, explain why.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Demonstrate that you have identified and evaluated:

  • the relevant ethical or responsible research and innovation considerations
  • how you will manage these considerations

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

If you are collecting or using data you should identify:

  • any legal and ethical considerations of collecting, releasing or storing the data (including consent, confidentiality, anonymisation, security and other ethical considerations and, in particular, strategies to not preclude further re-use of data)
  • formal information standards that your proposed work will comply with

All proposals have to comply with the ESRC framework for research ethics which includes guidance for applicants and links to related web resources.

All necessary ethical approvals must be in place before the project commences, but do not need to have been secured at the time of application.

Resources and cost justification

Word limit: 1,000

What will you need to deliver and manage the proposed infrastructure and how much will it cost?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Justify the application’s more costly resources, in particular:

  • project staff
  • significant travel for field work or collaboration (but not regular travel between collaborating organisations or to conferences)
  • any consumables beyond typical requirements, or that are required in exceptional quantities
  • all facilities and infrastructure costs
  • if applicable, disposal or decommissioning costs
  • all resources that have been costed as ‘Exceptions’
  • if applicable, subscription costs

Assessors are not looking for detailed costs or a line-by-line breakdown of all project resources. Overall, they want you to demonstrate how the resources you anticipate needing for your proposed work:

  • are comprehensive, appropriate, and justified
  • represent the optimal use of resources to achieve the intended outcomes
  • maximise potential outcomes and impacts

For detailed guidance on eligible costs please see the ESRC research funding guide.

Governance

Word limit: 1,000

How will you manage the award to successfully deliver its objectives?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Explain how the proposed award will be managed, demonstrating that it:

  • will be effectively governed, including details about advisory and decision-making structures
  • will be effectively and inclusively managed, demonstrated by a clear management plan
  • has clear leadership team roles and responsibilities
  • will manage and encourage partnerships with non-HEI organisations across government, industry and civil society
  • has plans for monitoring your progress as well as self-evaluation throughout the lifetime of your award. How your critical success indicators will be used to monitor and evaluate the hub’s progress should be included as part of your response
  • will put in place appropriate governance and administration to deliver the range of devolved funding opportunities

Within the governance section, we also expect you to:

  • indicate how the voices of hub users will be embedded in the hub’s governance arrangements

Within this section you can also demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. You must:

  • use images sparingly and only to convey important information that cannot easily be put into words
  • insert each new image onto a new line
  • provide a descriptive legend for each image immediately underneath it (this counts towards your word limit)
  • ensure files are smaller than 5MB and in JPEG, JPG, JPE, JFI, JIF, JFIF, PNG, GIF, BMP or WEBP format

Flexible fund

Word limit: 1,000

How will you use and manage the flexible fund?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Explain how you will use and manage the flexible fund so that it:

  • supports your objectives
  • distributes funding appropriately across a diverse range of activities
  • where appropriate, distributes funding through robust, transparent competitive processes
  • builds capacity in key fields and career stages

If you do not have any flexible funds enter ‘N/A’.

Your organisation’s support

Word limit: 10

Provide details of support from your research organisation.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Provide a Statement of Support from your research organisation detailing how they will support you, as the applicant, and your proposed activities. This should include details of any matched funding that will be provided to support the activity and any additional support that might add value to the work.

Assessors will be looking for a strong statement of support from your research organisation. It should show support of the application and also a commitment to the enduring sustainability of the infrastructure. This will need to be in the form of long term strategic and financial institutional commitment and should be through the provision of grant associated activities. This information should have been approved for submission by an appropriate institutional authority.

You must also include the following details:

  • a significant person’s name, their position and office or department, or all
  • office address or web link

Upload details are provided within the Funding Service on the actual application.

Project partners

Add details about any project partners’ contributions. If there are no project partners, you can indicate this on the Funding Service.

A project partner is a collaborating organisation who will have an integral role in the proposed research. This may include direct (cash) or indirect (in-kind) contributions such as expertise, staff time or use of facilities. Project partners may be in industry, academia, third sector or government organisations in the UK or overseas, including partners based in the EU.

Add the following project partner details:

  • the organisation name and address (searchable via a drop-down list or enter the organisation’s details manually, as applicable)
  • the project partner contact name and email address
  • the type of contribution (direct or in-direct) and its monetary value

If a detail is entered incorrectly and you have saved the entry, remove the specific project partner record and re-add it with the correct information.

For audit purposes, UKRI requires formal collaboration agreements to be put in place if an award is made.

Project partners letters or emails of support

Upload a single PDF containing the letters or emails of support from each partner you named in the Project Partner section. These should be uploaded in English or Welsh only.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Enter the words ‘attachment supplied’ in the text box, or if you do not have any project partners enter ‘N/A’. Each letter or email you provide should:

  • confirm the partner’s commitment to the project
  • clearly explain the value, relevance, and possible benefits of the work to them
  • describe any additional value that they bring to the project
  • be no more than one A4 page in length

The Funding Service will provide document upload details when you apply. If you do not have any project partners, you will be able to indicate this in the Funding Service.

Ensure you have prior agreement from project partners so that, if you are offered funding, they will support your project as indicated in the project partners’ section.

For audit purposes, UKRI requires formal collaboration agreements to be put in place if an award is made.

Do not provide letters of support from host and project co-leads’ research organisations.

Equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI)

Word limit: 1,000

What approaches and activities do you have planned that will embed EDI into your proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Explain how your EDI plan:

  • is effective and appropriate to embed EDI
  • comprehensively identifies the key EDI challenges and how they will be addressed and/or managed
  • will report and measure EDI outcomes
  • will maximise awareness of and mitigate against bias in your team and the wider community in terms of gender, ethnicity or any other protected characteristic through processes, behaviours and culture
  • describes how your approach will build upon and integrate existing EDI good practice into your proposed work
  • will share good practice with the wider community to ensure your research has maximum impact

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the service.

References may be included within this section.

How we will assess your application

Assessment process

We will assess your application using the following process.

Interview assessment panel

A commissioning panel will use the evidence provided by your application to assess the quality of your application and rank it alongside other applications. The commissioning panel will also conduct interviews with applicants after which the panel will make a funding recommendation.

We expect interviews to be held week commencing 19 May 2025

ESRC will make the final funding decision.

Timescale

We aim to communicate decisions in June 2025

Feedback

We will give feedback with the outcome of your application.

Principles of assessment

We support the San Francisco declaration on research assessment and recognise the relationship between research assessment and research integrity.

Find out about the UKRI principles of assessment and decision making.

Using generative artificial intelligence (AI) in peer review

Reviewers and panellists are not permitted to use generative AI tools to develop their assessment. Using these tools can potentially compromise the confidentiality of the ideas that applicants have entrusted to UKRI to safeguard.

For more detail see our policy on the use of generative AI.

We reserve the right to modify the assessment process as needed.

Assessment areas

The assessment areas we will use are:

  • Vision
  • Approach
  • Applicant and team capability to deliver
  • Governance (Networks and hubs)
  • Flexible funds (Networks and hubs)
  • EDI
  • Ethics and RRI
  • Project partners
  • Organisational support
  • Resource and costs justification

Find details of assessment questions and criteria under the ‘Application questions’ heading in the ‘How to apply’ section.

Contact details

Get help with your application

If you have a question and the answers aren’t provided on this page.

Important note: The Helpdesk is committed to helping users of the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Funding Service as effectively and as quickly as possible. In order to manage cases at peak volume times, the Helpdesk will triage and prioritise those queries with an imminent opportunity deadline or a technical issue. Enquiries raised where information is available on the Funding Finder opportunity page and should be understood early in the application process (for example, regarding eligibility or content/remit of an opportunity) will not constitute a priority case and will be addressed as soon as possible.

Contact details

For help and advice on costings and writing your proposal please contact your research office in the first instance, allowing sufficient time for your organisation’s submission process.

For questions related to this specific funding opportunity please contact researchskills@esrc.ukri.org

Any queries regarding the system or the submission of applications through the Funding Service should be directed to the helpdesk.

Email: support@funding-service.ukri.org
Phone: 01793 547490

Our phone lines are open:

  • Monday to Thursday 8:30am to 5:00pm
  • Friday 8:30am to 4:30pm

To help us process queries quicker, we request that users highlight the council and opportunity name in the subject title of their email query, include the application reference number, and refrain from contacting more than one mailbox at a time.

See further information on submitting an application.

Additional info

Background

What is our ambition for developing research skills in the social sciences?

The UK’s continued success as a global leader in social science research depends on well-trained and highly skilled people with a diversity of knowledge and skills. We are committed to supporting social scientists to maintain and develop world-class skills.

Our ambition is to foster a research environment within which:

  • social scientists can acquire the research skills needed to design and deliver high-quality, impactful research through projects that are increasingly interdisciplinary, cross-sector and international in nature
  • researchers at all career stages can participate in inclusive, relevant and high-quality research skills TCB opportunities in the social sciences and beyond
  • research skills training and TCB provision is developed by collective strategic leadership informed by the expertise and active engagement of ESRC’s full portfolio development and delivery of research skills TCB is effective and efficient

What is ESRC’s new approach?

We are investing in a new model which will bring about change and innovation in the development, delivery and provision of research skills training and capacity building (TCB).

It will encourage a culture of lifelong learning for researchers at all career stages and brings together research skills development provision so that it’s accessible to the community all in one place. Offering a route into all TCB opportunities from a rich range of training and providers will make it simpler and easier to address priority research skills needs, as well as improving the researcher experience.

Our new approach consists of four core components:

i. a focus on research skills utilised throughout the chronology of a typical research project, from research design and research methods to engagement with users of research and impact

ii. a federated structure coordinated by a strategic leadership hub, thereby facilitating access to a wider range of expertise across our investment portfolio (and new opportunities) to develop cutting-edge training. This will respond more effectively to evolving user, sector and societal needs

iii. a drive to enable a culture of lifelong learning with targeted support for researchers at all career stages including mid-career and senior researchers, from doctoral students through to established scholars

iv. a single, streamlined ‘shop window’ of TCB resources, which is more effective and efficient than the current distributed approach

This new approach will be inclusive and relevant, tailored to researchers at all career stages, whether doctoral students focused on building research skills or supervisors and principal investigators responsible for leading others. It will also reflect the expertise needed throughout an entire project, from design to impact. Responsive and agile, our new model will provide what we need today but also look to the future to ensure that we have the right expertise in years to come.

Longer term, we expect the model to improve access for social scientists to TCB provision outside the social sciences and for researchers outside the social sciences to be able to access provision available through the hub.

How have we developed our new approach?

Find out about the work we have undertaken to inform this new approach.

What do we mean by research skills?

It is important researchers can develop the breadth of research skills needed throughout the chronology of a typical research grant, from research design to impact. Research skills include, but are not limited to:

  • research design
  • research methods (qual, quant, mixed methods, trial methods)
  • data access, management and sharing
  • data analysis
  • evidence synthesis skills
  • evaluation skills
  • knowledge mobilisation
  • engaging with research users
  • policy engagement skills
  • impact skills
  • co-production
  • public engagement

Monitoring metrics and stage gate reviews for the research skills strategic leadership hub

The hub will be subject to two stage gate reviews at the end of year one and at the end of year three.

Stage gate one will:

  • review progress against the key deliverables and milestones identified in the successful application. It will seek to understand if year 1 goals have been achieved and what outputs, and outcomes have been achieved
  • evaluate how effective ways of working have impacted on the delivery of the hub’s activities and users’ experience
  • set benchmarks for monitoring metrics and consider the targets proposed by the hub for years two and three

Stage gate two will:

  • review progress against key deliverables and milestones identified in the successful application. It will seek to understand if goals for years two and three have been achieved; if goals for years four and five are on track; and what outputs, outcomes and impacts have been achieved
  • assess if the hub is delivering our strategic goals and expected outcomes as set out in the funding opportunity
  • review monitoring metrics data against the benchmarks and targets set in stage gate one
  • assess the hub’s plans for maintaining access to resources hosted by the NCRM Resource Repository when its funding ends in December 2031
  • be forward looking, considering the suitability of the current approach for a further five years and if/how emerging needs and challenges should be incorporated

Monitoring metrics will be agreed with the successful applicant. They will include areas such as:

  • participant engagement including uptake of TCB activities; and diversity of participants
  • TCB delivery including delivery and participation modes; diversity of training providers; TCB activities in priority areas; and target audience/skill level
  • visibility and user engagement
  • use of TCB IT infrastructure
  • collaboration

Project partners

Applicants should note the information on project partners in the relevant application question. Project partners provide contributions to the delivery of a project and therefore should not normally seek to claim funds from that project, excepting small scale costs such as Travel and Subsistence to facilitate their involvement in the project. Organisations or individuals that are applicants on a project, for example the project lead, project co-leads or any other core team role, are not eligible to be project partners. You cannot include someone from the host or co-lead organisations, including other departments, as a project partner.

For further information on the roles and responsibilities of project partners, check the ‘costings information’ section of the UKRI FEC grants: standard terms and conditions of grant guidance.

Webinars for potential applicants

Two webinars for potential applicants considering submitting an expression of interest were held in July and September 2024.

Watch July 2024 webinar

Watch September 2024 webinar

Research and innovation impact

Impact can be defined as the long-term intended or unintended effect research and innovation has on society, economy and the environment; to individuals, organisations, and the wider global population.

Research disruption due to COVID-19

We recognise that the COVID-19 pandemic has caused major interruptions and disruptions across our communities. We are committed to ensuring that individual applicants and their wider team, including partners and networks, are not penalised for any disruption to their career, such as:

  • breaks and delays
  • disruptive working patterns and conditions
  • the loss of ongoing work
  • role changes that may have been caused by the pandemic

Reviewers and panel members will be advised to consider the unequal impacts that COVID-19 related disruption might have had on the capability to deliver and career development of those individuals included in the application. They will be asked to consider the capability of the applicant and their wider team to deliver the research they are proposing.

Where disruptions have occurred, you can highlight this within your application if you wish, but there is no requirement to detail the specific circumstances that caused the disruption.

Supporting documents

Equality impact assessment (DOCX, 97KB)

Guidance on developing a logic model (PDF, 101KB)

This is the website for UKRI: our seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help improve our online products and services.