We are running this funding opportunity on the new UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Funding Service so please ensure that your organisation is registered. You cannot apply on the Joint Electronic Submissions (Je-S) system.
The project lead is responsible for completing the application process on the Funding Service, but we expect all team members and project partners to contribute to the application.
Only the lead research organisation can submit an application to UKRI.
To apply
Select ‘Start application’ near the beginning of this Funding finder page.
- Confirm you are the project lead.
- Sign in or create a Funding Service account. To create an account, select your organisation, verify your email address, and set a password. If your organisation is not listed, email support@funding-service.ukri.org
Please allow at least 10 working days for your organisation to be added to the Funding Service.
- Answer questions directly in the text boxes. You can save your answers and come back to complete them or work offline and return to copy and paste your answers. If we need you to upload a document, follow the upload instructions in the Funding Service. All questions and assessment criteria are listed in the How to apply section on this Funding finder page.
- Allow enough time to check your application in ‘read-only’ view before sending to your research office.
- Send the completed application to your research office for checking. They will return it to you if it needs editing.
- Your research office will submit the completed and checked application to UKRI.
Where indicated, you can also demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. You should:
- use images sparingly and only to convey important information that cannot easily be put into words
- insert each new image onto a new line
- provide a descriptive legend for each image immediately underneath it (this counts towards your word limit)
- files must be smaller than 5MB and in JPEG, JPG, JPE, JFI, JIF, JFIF, PNG, GIF, BMP or WEBP format
Watch our research office webinars about the new Funding Service.
For more guidance on the Funding Service, see:
References
Applications should be self-contained, and hyperlinks should only be used to provide links directly to reference information. To ensure the information’s integrity is maintained, where possible, persistent identifiers such as digital object identifiers should be used. Assessors are not required to access links to carry out assessment or recommend a funding decision. You should use your discretion when including references and prioritise those most pertinent to the application.
References should be included in the appropriate question section of the application and be easily identifiable by the assessors for example, (Smith, Research Paper, 2019)
You must not include links to web resources to extend your application.
Deadline
EPSRC must receive your application by 4.00pm UK time on 19 September 2024.
You will not be able to apply after this time.
Make sure you are aware of and follow any internal institutional deadlines.
Following the submission of your application to the funding opportunity, your application cannot be changed, and applications will not be returned for amendment. If your application does not follow the guidance, it may be rejected. If an application is withdrawn prior to peer review or office rejected due to substantive errors in the application, it cannot be resubmitted to the opportunity.
Personal data
Processing personal data
EPSRC, as part of UKRI, will need to collect some personal information to manage your Funding Service account and the registration of your funding applications.
We will handle personal data in line with UK data protection legislation and manage it securely. For more information, including how to exercise your rights, read our privacy notice.
Publication of outcomes
EPSRC, as part of UKRI, will publish the outcomes of this funding opportunity at Tableau tool web page.
If your application is successful, we will publish some personal information on the UKRI Gateway to Research.
Core team
List the key members of your team and assign them roles from the following:
- project lead (PL)
- project co-lead (UK) (PcL)
- project co-lead (international) (PcL (I))
- specialist
- grant manager
- professional enabling staff
- research and innovation associate
- technician
- visiting researcher
- researcher co-lead (RcL)
Only list one individual as project lead.
A research technical professional can apply as a project lead or project co-led, provided that:
- their appointment is resourced from the central funds of their institution at the time of application
- their level of responsibilities and duties is appropriate to a person with substantial research experience
- their contract extends beyond the duration of the project
Find out more about UKRI’s core team roles in funding applications.
Summary
Word limit: 550
In plain English, provide a summary we can use to identify the most suitable experts to assess your application.
We usually make this summary publicly available on external-facing websites, therefore do not include any confidential or sensitive information. Make it suitable for a variety of readers, for example:
- opinion-formers
- policymakers
- the public
- the wider research community
Guidance for writing a summary
Clearly describe your proposed work in terms of:
- context
- the challenge the project addresses
- aims and objectives
- potential applications and benefits
Application questions
Vision and Approach
Word limit: 2,200
What’s your institution’s strategy for the allocation and why should EPSRC fund it?
What the assessors are looking for in your response
Evidence of how your institution’s strategy and decision-making process for the allocation meet at least one of the three funding opportunity objectives:
- core equipment that will benefit multiple users, enhance sharing, usage and collaboration in one or more departments (or institutions). The majority of research undertaken using the equipment should be directly relevant to the EPSRC research portfolio.
- invest to save activities: upgrading and improving existing equipment to:
- extend its lifespan through the replacement of obsolete or worn-out components
- expand its capability to be of value to a wider range of users
- improve efficiency of the equipment allowing for more productive use of staff time
- enhancing environmental sustainability (for example, through recycling cryogenic cooling liquids)
- includes capital costs incurred in co-locating existing or new equipment with the aim of providing enhanced sharing, usage and collaboration benefits to a wider research community are encouraged
- providing capital investment with substantial and demonstrable, but not exclusive, benefit to early career researchers and doctoral training activities that they are involved in. Support early career researchers and a critical mass of doctoral training to promote a culture of collaboration, equipment sharing and maximising usage.
The strategic alignment should be up to 1,500 words and demonstrate that an appropriate decision-making process has been undertaken to decide the allocation of funding.
In this section, your response should also include a workplan of up to 500 words for:
- details of the timescales for the procurement process, delivery, installation and getting the equipment fully functional
- the expected lifetime of the equipment
- when potential risks may occur
You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.
References may be included within this section.
Items of equipment and cost justification
Word limit: 1,650
What items of equipment does your institution intend to purchase and how are these justified?
What the assessors are looking for in your response
Provide for each item or group of items:
- a brief description of the item(s)
- cost of the item(s)
- how the item fulfils one or more objectives of the funding opportunity
Where equipment is being purchased it is expected that the institution will have decided what items of equipment they intend to purchase ahead of submitting the grant.
For cost justification, assessors are not looking for detailed costs or a line-by-line breakdown of all project resources. Overall, they want you to demonstrate how the resources you anticipate needing for your proposed work:
- are comprehensive, appropriate, and justified
- represent the optimal use of resources to achieve the intended outcomes
- maximise potential outcomes and impacts
References may be included within this section.
Benefit realisation
Word limit: 1,650
What are your plans for identifying and realising the benefits and added value of the investment? To what extent are these plans realistic, measurable and deliverable and over what timescale?
What the assessors are looking for in your response
Evidence to what extent:
- will this investment enable the institution to maintain and improve your world class lab provision and therefore facilitate the undertaking of high-quality research and training by your academic community?
- this investment is in addition to any planned investments in capital equipment at the institutional level and is not used to replace planned investment. Please explain how you will demonstrate the added value of this investment. For example, how will this investment enable the institution to enable research that otherwise couldn’t be enabled?
- will this investment develop anticipated benefits and justify how they will be realised:
- what will success look like and how will you know it has been achieved?
- what steps will be taken to identify, monitor and evaluate the benefits of this investment?
- what activities will be put in place to ensure that your research community (including ECRs, PhDs and RTPs) benefit from the equipment.
- for underpinning equipment:
- how will you monitor the number and type of users, enhanced sharing, usage and collaboration?
- for invest to save elements:
- how will you quantify this in terms of money saved, staff time saved, increased efficiency or productivity?
- for ECRs and doctoral training:
- consider how you will establish a culture of collaboration, equipment sharing and maximising the usage of equipment amongst your ECRs and students.
- what other benefits will ECRs/students gain? Examples of benefits could be but are not limited to: increased collaboration, greater productivity or a step change in science. How will you provide evidence of these benefits?
References may be included within this section.
Sustainability
Word limit: 1,100
How will this investment consider financial, user base, people, equipment and environmental sustainability to sustain research excellence?
What the assessors are looking for in your response
The EPSRC Research Infrastructure theme recognises the importance of considering the sustainability of research infrastructure investments from multiple perspectives. As part of the application process for the EPSRC Core Equipment 2024 funding opportunity research organisations are required to provide an Institutional Research Infrastructure Sustainability Statement.
In the statement, evidence to what extent has the investment realistically demonstrated:
Financial sustainability:
- how have you established the lifetime costs of the equipment you are requesting? This may include the plan for charging model and recovery of running costs (maintenance, repairs, consumables, staff time) beyond the lifetime of the grant.
- can you describe your approaches to making sure that equipment across your institution is operated to minimise the financial impact on the university?
Sustainability of the user base:
- how will you sustain and evolve a diverse and inclusive user baser throughout and beyond the lifetime of the equipment?
Sustainability of the people:
- what steps will you take to champion the visibility, recognition and career development of research technical professionals (RTP) and other technical staff that help sustain infrastructure capability across your institution?
Sustainability of the equipment:
- how will you sustain the equipment in terms of maintenance, repairs, consumables, staff time throughout its lifetime?
- what has been the institution’s track record of sustaining previous core equipment investments?
Environmental sustainability:
- how will you improve your understanding of the environmental impact of these investments?
- what steps will be taken at an institutional level to enhance the environmental sustainability of your research infrastructures?
References may be included within this section.
Project partners
Add details about any project partners’ contributions. If there are no project partners, you can indicate this on the Funding Service.
A project partner is a collaborating organisation who will have an integral role in the proposed research. This may include direct (cash) or indirect (in-kind) contributions such as expertise, staff time or use of facilities.
Add the following project partner details:
- the organisation name and address (searchable via a drop-down list or enter the organisation’s details manually, as applicable)
- the project partner contact name and email address
- the type of contribution (direct or in-direct) and its monetary value
If a detail is entered incorrectly and you have saved the entry, remove the specific project partner record and re-add it with the correct information.
For audit purposes, UKRI requires formal collaboration agreements to be put in place if an award is made.
Project partners: letters (or emails) of support
Upload a single PDF containing the letters or emails of support from each partner you named in the Project Partner section. These should be uploaded in English or Welsh only.
What the assessors are looking for in your response
Enter the words ‘attachment supplied’ in the text box, or if you do not have any project partners enter N/A. Each letter or email you provide should:
- confirm the partner’s commitment to the project
- clearly explain the value, relevance, and possible benefits of the work to them
- describe any additional value that they bring to the project
- the page limit is two sides A4 per partner
The Funding Service will provide document upload details when you apply. If you do not have any project partners, you will be able to indicate this in the Funding Service.
Ensure you have prior agreement from project partners so that, if you are offered funding, they will support your project as indicated in the contributions template.
For audit purposes, UKRI requires formal collaboration agreements to be put in place if an award is made.
Do not provide letters of support from host and project co-leads’ research organisations.
Ethics and responsible research and innovation (RRI)
Word limit: 500
What are the ethical or RRI implications and issues relating to the proposed work? If you do not think that the proposed work raises any ethical or RRI issues, explain why.
What the assessors are looking for in your response
Demonstrate that you have identified and evaluated:
- the relevant ethical or responsible research and innovation considerations
- how you will manage these considerations
You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.
If you are collecting or using data, identify:
- any legal and ethical considerations of collecting, releasing or storing the data including consent, confidentiality, anonymisation, security and other ethical considerations and, in particular, strategies to not preclude further reuse of data
- formal information standards with which your study will comply
