We need to enable reviewers to make an informed judgement on whether the resources requested are appropriate for the research proposed.
The resources and costs section of your proposal should explain why the resources requested are appropriate for the research proposed taking into account the nature and complexity of the research.
It should not simply be a list of the resources required but should justify the application’s more costly resources, in particular:
- project staff
- significant travel for field work or collaboration (but not regular travel between collaborating organisations or to conferences)
- any equipment that will cost more than £10,000
- any consumables beyond typical requirements, or that are required in exceptional quantities
- all facilities and infrastructure costs
- all resources that have been costed as ‘Exceptions’
Assessors are not looking for detailed costs or a line-by-line breakdown of all project resources. Overall, they want you to demonstrate how the resources you anticipate needing for your proposed work:
- are comprehensive, appropriate, and justified
- represent the optimal use of resources to achieve the intended outcomes
- maximise potential outcomes and impacts
The overall costs captured in the Funding Service are at the higher fund heading level but the narrative text box is where you can tell us more about what you will be using the funds for and to justify their requirement.
Any proposals requesting items that would ordinarily be found in a department, for example non-specialist computers, should include justification both for why they are required for the project and why they cannot be provided from the research organisation’s own resources (including funding from Indirect costs from grants).